Research method
How we verify hotel wellness facilities
How hotel claims move from source material to reviewed public evidence, including freshness, uncertainty and correction handling.
- Reviewed
- 16 August 2026
- Method
- MyWellnessHotel research standard
- Status
- Editorial preview
Short answer
We collect current source material, evaluate each claim against a specific amenity definition, preserve conflicts and publish only through a reviewed transaction. Missing evidence stays unknown.
This guide is wired for editorial review and remains outside search indexes until its source review and publication checklist are complete.
Find the current source
We begin with current official hotel pages, booking material and authorized partner information. Current official imagery can support a claim when the facility is visually identifiable and the image rights are documented.
Editorial and traveler sources can add context, but they do not silently overrule a more current conflict. Conflicting evidence creates a review task.
Apply the exact rubric
Each priority amenity has a qualification rule. A cold shower is not a cold plunge, a heated pool is not automatically thermal and warm timber imagery does not establish an infrared sauna.
The reviewer records the claim, qualifiers, source, date, limitations and public evidence state. The model can propose; it cannot publish.
Keep freshness and corrections visible
Claims have their own review windows because a program price changes faster than a building location.
- Access and hours usually reviewed within 90 days
- Facilities usually reviewed within 180 days
- Programs usually reviewed within 90 days
- Corrections always return to human review
Method and limits
This guide explains the current MyWellnessHotel qualification method. Hotel facilities and programs change, so trip-critical details should be confirmed before a non-refundable booking. The catalog describes travel products and does not provide medical advice.